GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK106 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 883 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650