GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK106 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M