GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK106 | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 950A
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A