GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 278 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK106 | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 75.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2