GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 760A

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Quadro K2200M has 18% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 39 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	20−22
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	8−9	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	45−50	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	85−90
4K / 2160p	−	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	12−14	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	120−130
medium / 1080p	16−18	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	9−10	40−45
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	30−33	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	18−20	70−75
medium / 768p	12−14	45−50
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK106	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	17 March 2014	19 July 2014
Pipelines	768	640
Core clock speed	628 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock	657 MHz
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	42.05	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares