GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 26 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 1208 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |