GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K4000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4000M.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 28 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 1208 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK106 | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000