GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 78 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 808 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |