GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro P500
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P500, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Quadro P500, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 83% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P500 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 827 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 1004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK106 | GP108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1519 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |