GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon 520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 402 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 1758 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 214% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 50% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK106 | Oland |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Check Price |