GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 272 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK106 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |