GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro 5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Radeon Pro 5500M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 54% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 7992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GK106 | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 139.2 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI