GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK106 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |