GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro WX 3200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 3200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 18% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 454 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK106 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |