GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R7 250

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 760A Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors N/A
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
  Check Price
  • Radeon R7 250 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
  • GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
  • GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2858 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 3−4 3−4
ultra / 1080p 1−2 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 14−16 14−16
medium / 1080p 6−7 5−6
GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 760A Radeon R7 250
Architecture Kepler GCN
Code name GK106 Oland XT
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 17 March 2014 1 October 2013
Pipelines 768 384
Core clock speed 628 MHz
Boost Clock 657 MHz 1050 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million 950 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 42.05 25.20
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops 716.8 gflops
Length 168 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4008 MHz 1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth 64.13 GB/s 72 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 117 Mh/s
Design reference
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration +
  Check Price