GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R8 M365DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R8 M365DX.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M365DX is 92 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 3208 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 214% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 50% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 287% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK106 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |