GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M290X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M290X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M290X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M290X has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M290X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 222 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M290X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2808 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Dota 2 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Fortnite is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK106 | Neptune |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 900 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Check Price |