GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 18% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 303 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2608 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GK106 | Polaris 22 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Check Price |