FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 760M
In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 760M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
GeForce GTX 760M
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 174% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 760M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
95−100
80−85
medium / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
low / 720p
80−85
65−70
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
24−27
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
GeForce GTX 760M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
N14E-GL
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
30 May 2013
Pipelines
1280
768
Core clock speed
725 MHz
657 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
42.05
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
1,009 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 API
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price