FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 760M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 760M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 760M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 168 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cypress | N14E-GL |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |