GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 760M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 760M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against GeForce GTX 760M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 172% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 643 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF104 | N14E-GL |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 288 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 657 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | 768 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 54 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |