GeForce GTX 760M vs GeForce MX250
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX250.
GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX250 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX250 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M or GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce MX250
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760M has 450% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 861 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 5000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
190−200
medium / 768p
110−120
160−170
ultra / 1080p
55−60
85−90
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
90−95
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−105
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
27−30
45−50
medium / 768p
18−20
30−33
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce MX250
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N14E-GL
N17S-G2
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2013
20 February 2019
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
657 MHz
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1582 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
42.05
24.91
Floating-point performance
1,009 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2
CUDA
+
6.1
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price