GeForce GTX 760M vs GRID K140Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K140Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K140Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K140Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 193 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 109% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 850% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GL | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |