GeForce GTX 760M vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 88 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GL | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |