GeForce GTX 760M vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 88 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14E-GL | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |