GeForce GTX 760M vs GRID M10 8Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 376 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14E-GL | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |