GeForce GTX 760M vs P106 090
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and P106 090, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and P106 090 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 090
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 697 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6008 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N14E-GL | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |