GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro 2000D
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro 2000D, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Quadro 2000D, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 12% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 32 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14E-GL | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |