GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 96% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 57 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 46% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14E-GL | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |