GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 172% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 55 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14E-GL | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |