GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
GeForce GTX 760M and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
85−90
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
24−27
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
N14E-GL
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
768
1,024
Core clock speed
657 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
42.05
67.20
Floating-point performance
1,009 gflops
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
