GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon HD 4810
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon HD 4810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 72% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 32 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | N14E-GL | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |