GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon HD 4830
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon HD 4830, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Radeon HD 4830, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4830
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 72% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 82 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 157% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14E-GL | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 21 October 2008 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |