GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
140−150
240−250
medium / 768p
110−120
210−220
ultra / 1080p
55−60
130−140
QHD / 1440p
30−35
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
85−90
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
8−9
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
4−5
9−10
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
65−70
130−140
medium / 1080p
24−27
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 207% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
55−60
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
27−30
85−90
medium / 768p
18−20
55−60
high / 1080p
10−11
30−33
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
N14E-GL
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
15 November 2018
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
657 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
42.05
76.16
Floating-point performance
1,009 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price