GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
140−150
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
85−90
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
9−10
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
24−27
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
27−30
27−30
medium / 768p
18−20
18−20
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-GL
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
21 March 2018
Pipelines
768
512
Core clock speed
657 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
42.05
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,009 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
