GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-GL | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |