GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 243 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 1996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-GL | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | no data |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro P400
- GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro P400
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 760M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M