GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14E-GL | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |