GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R9 M375X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M375X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M375X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 268 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14E-GL | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |