GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
When comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 11, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 11 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega 11
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760M has 266% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | N14E-GL | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 768 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | - |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |