GeForce GTX 760M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 332% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 83 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14E-GL | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |