GeForce GTX 760M vs Tesla M6
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla M6. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla M6. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M6
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 273 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 368% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 392% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14E-GL | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |