GeForce GTX 760M vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 27% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 72 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | N14E-GL | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |