GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 212% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce 830M
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760