GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
IGP
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Radeon RX Vega M GH has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 213 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−33
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−11
35−40
4K / 2160p
7−8
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
250−260
medium / 768p
190−200
220−230
ultra / 1080p
110−120
180−190
QHD / 1440p
80−85
110−120
4K / 2160p
40−45
70−75
high / 768p
160−170
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
7−8
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
110−120
180−190
medium / 1080p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
12−14
30−35
4K / 2160p
12−14
24−27
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
100−105
140−150
medium / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
35−40
70−75
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
70−75
130−140
medium / 768p
40−45
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2013
7 January 2018
Pipelines
1536
1536
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1063 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
2x 2540 Million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
114.2
Floating-point performance
3,656 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price