GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
IGP
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 81 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−11
QHD / 1440p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−33
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
220−230
medium / 768p
190−200
190−200
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
80−85
65−70
4K / 2160p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
100−105
95−100
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
40−45
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Code name
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2013
1 February 2018
Pipelines
1536
1280
Core clock speed
850 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
2x 2540 Million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
80.88
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
