GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 83% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M