FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 765M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 765M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 765M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 765M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 160 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 765M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N14-GE |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 55.23 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |