GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 765M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 765M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 765M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 765M
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670 has 126% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
GeForce GTX 670 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 765M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 670 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 765M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 130 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 765M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 1994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
55−60
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
14−16
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
250−260
160−170
medium / 768p
220−230
130−140
ultra / 1080p
180−190
70−75
QHD / 1440p
110−120
40−45
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−33
high / 768p
210−220
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
110−120
70−75
ultra / 1080p
100−110
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
45−50
10−12
ultra / 1080p
40−45
10−11
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
60−65
18−20
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
75−80
medium / 1080p
110−120
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
14−16
QHD / 1440p
30−35
4−5
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
65−70
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
140−150
65−70
medium / 768p
120−130
55−60
high / 1080p
70−75
18−20
ultra / 1080p
30−35
8−9
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
20−22
4−5
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
130−140
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
130−140
35−40
medium / 768p
85−90
21−24
high / 1080p
45−50
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
50−55
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 765M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
N14-GE
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
10 May 2012
30 May 2013
Pipelines
1344
768
Core clock speed
980 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
863 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
55.23
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
1,326 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256-bit GDDR5
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
1344
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
97 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
13 Mh/s
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
