GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
When comparing GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M or Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
150−160
medium / 768p
130−140
130−140
ultra / 1080p
70−75
65−70
QHD / 1440p
40−45
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
75−80
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
90−95
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
35−40
30−35
medium / 768p
21−24
21−24
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
40−45
40−45
GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
N14-GE
Skylake GT4e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2013
1 September 2015
Pipelines
768
72
Core clock speed
850 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.23
72.00
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.97
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
